MCP Verdict
Home/Methodology
Public methodology

Methodology

MCP Verdict is an independent research and synthesis publication. We organize information from official documentation, repositories, release notes, package metadata, vendor statements, credible independent research, and clearly labeled community reports. We do not imply that a claim was independently tested unless that work was actually performed and documented.

How sources are prioritized

Protocol specifications, official documentation, official repositories, release notes, package registries, and vendor advisories are preferred for factual and time-sensitive claims. Credible independent research adds outside scrutiny. Community reports can identify useful leads, but they are labeled and are not treated as universal proof.

How evidence is labeled

Material claims should be described as officially documented, repository-confirmed, vendor-reported, independently reported, community-reported, not independently reproduced, conflicting, unknown, or editorial inference. A source-review date indicates when the cited material was checked; it is not a certification.

How editorial conclusions are formed

Profiles and comparisons consider identity, maintenance signals, documented capabilities, authentication, permissions, reported compatibility, limitations, alternatives, and workflow fit. Editorial conclusions are conditional and should explain the observations supporting them, the important limitation, and when another option may be better.

What MCP Verdict does not claim

Documentation review is not a security audit, certification, runtime test, benchmark, or guarantee of compatibility. Scores, measurements, and successful setup claims are published only when a defined method and supporting record exist. Otherwise, the original source and evidence limitation are stated.

Freshness and corrections

Volatile information—such as pricing, plan availability, authentication, versions, permissions, and lifecycle status—should be checked against current primary sources. Material factual errors are corrected in place and recorded on the public Corrections page.